<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>BUSRAGE Discussions Topic: Luas Red Line Couldn't Kill Bus Route 90</title>
<link>http://busrage.com/forum/</link>
<description>BUSRAGE Discussions Topic: Luas Red Line Couldn't Kill Bus Route 90</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:16:25 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Al on "Luas Red Line Couldn't Kill Bus Route 90"</title>
<link>http://busrage.com/forum/topic/3442#post-3442</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3442@http://busrage.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p align=justify&#62;I have to give DB credit on that one...they kept the 90 running, despite all of the predictions that it would be cancelled like the route 8 when the Luas Red Line came on-line.&#60;br&#62;&#60;br&#62;Of course, their wonderful &#34;surplus&#34; aided them in keeping it running, right?  Yeah, right...(hey, I'm sure they gave the &#34;DART is duplicate service&#34; excuse when cancelling the 8; but see how it doesn't work with the route 90, which is still surviving quite well.  Do the same for the 8, O DB Demigods; ye have had a &#34;surplus&#34; for two years running and can well afford it...)&#60;br&#62;&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
