HOME   NEWS   DISCUSSIONS   TIMETABLES   WEBCAMS   ROUTE PLANNERS   CONTACT  

Report reviews the current state of reviewing reports about reviews

The Irish Times have picked up on something we’ve been banging on about for a while, namely the obsession in this country with continually reviewing and reviewing infrastructure plans, without actually doing any of it.

Repeated reviews and constant consultations have halted progress and stifled innovation in our transport network, writes Tim O’Brien

ON MONDAY May 12th, the Department of Transport announced the end of public consultation on its sustainable Travel and Transport Action Plan. On Monday May 19th, the Minister, Noel Dempsey, announced the start of a period of public consultation on the Future of Transport in Dublin.

In the week between, the Dublin Transportation Office (DTO) called for the public to engage in consultation on its new Transport Strategy for the Greater Dublin Area (Dublin, Kildare, Meath and Wicklow) for the period up to 2030.

The new DTO strategy will replace the DTO Platform for Change 2000-2016. The Platform for Change is similar, but not the same, as the Dublin elements in yet another policy document: Transport 21.

Confused? Well you ought to be. The State’s policy in relation to air and sea ports, road and rail plans, even road safety strategies and the encompassing legislative framework is, and has been for a decade, beset by review and counter review.

The National Roads Authority (NRA) is proceeding with the 1999 plan to link Dublin to regional cities and the Border by motorways or high quality dual carriageways, having reviewed the 1998 Roads Needs Study. It subsequently reviewed both the cost and timescale of the plan.

A controversy over the maximum height of lorries on Irish roads led to former taoiseach Bertie Ahern announcing in 2006 that the maximum height of lorries using the Dublin Port Tunnel would be 4.65 metres and any lorries higher than that should be “turned back” in the port. This is currently under review by the North South body InterTrade Ireland, which recently recommended a standard maximum height North and South of 4.95 metres.

The NRA also reviewed the use of 2+1 lane roads and decided they should be replaced by 2+2 roads. It also reviewed the dropping of plans for the Eastern Bypass which it says should again be Government policy.

Dublin Port itself was subject of a review by the Progressive Democrats, whose former leader and tánaiste Michael McDowell called for the Government to relocate the port to north County Dublin and build “Manhattan” in the docklands. Plans to relocate the port or reclaim additional land in Dublin Bay are currently under review by Government, although both are said to be progressing.

Séamus Brennan’s 2003 plan to set up Cork and Shannon airports as independent entities free from debt was reviewed by the Government and the plan is now that they should be partially free from debt.

The Strategic Rail Review was published by Brennan in 2003 and this found against the reopening of the Western Rail Corridor and the Dublin to Navan line. This was reviewed by the Government in 2005 and both schemes are now policy. Mary O’Rourke “reviewed” the plan to have a Luas link in Dublin City Centre, and this review was subsequently reviewed. We now know that there will be a link but we don’t know exactly when.

The plan to ban private cars from Dublin City Centre in 2010, in time for the construction of Metro, was “reviewed” by the Oireachtas Committee on Transport. Committee chairman Frank Fahy proposed in a draft report that this be brought forward to 2009. But, following prompting from his committee members and the City Business Association, this plan is under review.

In road safety terms, a plan to roll out speed cameras across the State was first mooted in 1987, by Dempsey and Bertie Ahern. It was never actually reviewed, but it has not happened either. Nor has the plan to reduce the acceptable level of alcohol in drivers’ blood.

In legislative terms we have had the 2007 Roads Act, the 2008 Dublin Transport Authority Bill, and the soon-to-be launched review of the 1932 Transport Act.

And we haven’t even started on the M50!

2 Responses to “Report reviews the current state of reviewing reports about reviews”

  1. It is indeed a very striking aspect of modern Ireland that it collectively finds decision making a very tough process,to the point of virtually refusing to make or abide with anything resembling one !
    In terms of road based public transport,we have been told for quite some time now (1933 perhaps?) that the 1932 Road Transport Act is a crock which cannot facilitate progress in any form.
    Yet the 1932 Act was amended in 2000 to allow for the provisions of the Equal Status Act 2000 to be provided for in Public Transport.
    Yet mysteriously and only in response to questioning by the Dail Committee on Transport,the Minister for Transport sez the provisions of the ESA 2000 CANNOT be enforced on Private Sector Operators due to the inadequacies of the 1932 Act.
    One wonders why the Oireachts bothered to amend the 1932 Act at all if that amendment is useless..??
    No doubt the 1932 Act has been studied into submission with the net result being a Department which can only observe unlicenced services being run in flagrant breach of the Law.
    Even the much vaunted DTA Bill now seems to be little more than yet another vehicle upon which a new generation of snake-oil salesmen can ride through town on.
    It`s difficult in many ways to admit,but there are so many manifestations of inherent inability to self-govern that sub contracting our administration to Europe may not be a bad idea after all !!

  2. No; it’s a really bad idea. Especially since the way they’re going there, they intend to make it permanent. Ireland will have to fight for Home Rule again if that Lisbon Treaty is not killed with one swift stroke (to paraphrase Governor Tarkin from “Star Wars”). AAMOF, all of this political indecision on the home front, I suspect, is influenced and encouraged by Brussels in order to make “centralisation” of the powers in Brussels and taking them away from the sovereign governments more palatable to an overworked and generally unsuspecting public. (Consider the “re-sale” of the Nice Treaty.)

Leave a Reply